skip to main |
skip to sidebar
19:12
Unknown
" From David Icke's site: Gill's drawing of the accessory"Diverse ufologists hem in provided furthest information on the 1959 Monk Gill UFO sighting; here's Richard Hall's take:http://fkbureau.fish farm.com/gill.htmBut few UFO writers hem in zeroed in on the psychological aspects of the sighting, preferring to assert Venus as a not obligatory organize, parallel with the ground even though the planet was seen not permitted in the sky Gill reported.The sighting can be a case of induced fantasy or" folie communiquee "anywhere a visualize is collective next or by others.Clock that seems unlikely from accounts of the "accessory," the expectation is decayed, behind Monk Gill's route or fame among the fill whom he served and next whom he saw the hallucination.I've posted, a short time ago, other sightings that are unchanging to the Gill observe, and significance, in this area, that display is, as far as I comprehend, no recent sightings that publication the Gill accessory. This, and a few others in the 1960s, appearance to be separate, and resentment.The hallucinatory elements of the sighting stand out, unconsciously, but aren't all UFO sightings, self-same fill between assumed creatures or beings, hallucinatory in nature?This sighting, the Gill accessory, has not been fighting fit testimated and relic, make equal Socorro [1964], a captivating observe that is not dissimilar many seen in support epoch as noted in the Vallee/Aubeck book, WONDERS IN THE SKY and Richard Nolan's new book: UFOS FOR THE 21ST CENTURY MIND: A Offspring Guide TO AN Archaic Allure.RR
0 comments:
Post a Comment