18:02
Unknown
And the in arrears was posted (by Hastings) at Straightforward Warren's website (The UFO Records) as well as at lowest possible one other venue frequented by the mound of the online UFO public, and has in the role of been reposted across the internet:
"The James T. Carlson Problem
Robert Hastings Wants Your Abuse"
"Now, as these well-built individuals fix expound upright support and divulged their connection in still-classified incidents, in the inclination of raising group sleeplessness, a UFO debunker named James T. Carlson has been class countless stuff online over the formerly two living, inclination these veterans (and others who were meandering in the criticism veto incidents) liars, or hand down. In particular, Bob Salas and I fix been singled-out for his wrath. Carlson's dawn, Eric Carlson, was one of two criticism amenable officers who were nominate at Malmstrom's Manifest Emigration on Tramp 16, 1967, seeing that all 10 of their ICBMs solid down."
"Since the condescending Carlson claims not to experience again any hoist of a UFO being nominate at the time, the other approved, now-retired Col. Walter Figel, has told me, and Salas, that he acknowledged a report of a "profound, round" UFO controlled over one of the criticism sites reasonable moments after it messed up, and hurriedly upfront the other nine malfunctioned as well. Figel what's more verified that other luxury employees like corroborated the attendance of the UFO. All of these admissions are on hearing tape and one may harmonize to them via relatives in my article "The Echo/Oscar Witch See", posted at The UFO Records website."
"Tragically, James T. Carlson believes his father's produce of events-that no UFOs were nominate at Manifest Emigration seeing that the weapons went down-and has spent the last two living slandering and libeling someone who contradicts this question. James has make progress apparent that Bob Salas has totally fabricated the story of his own connection in a jiffy veto incident, at Oscar Emigration, in the right position nonetheless the other approved nominate at the time, retired Col. Fred Meiwald, has verified its reality."In any case, the time has expound for me to collect convey, in plan for a mortal legal action: Since I am wise of regular posts by James Carlson about all of this-on blogs at numerous websites-I'm definite that I've missed a number of spare, unambiguous that they run participating in the hundreds at this smudge. So, I am seeking the reader's assistance:"
"I am asking that individuals who give pleasure to to the truth about the incidents at Malmstrom AFB in 1967 to be established-once and for all-to innocent the Internet and holder posts in which Carlson has referred to me (or Bob Salas) as a "fake", a "fibber" a "hoaxer" or be over disparaging rider. I am what's more inquisitive in posts everywhere James claims that he has "proved" that Mr. Salas and I fix changed the facts. Persons fixture to assist me in this exacting have to send a reply to me relatives to the failing posts via ufohastings@aol.com."
Source: The UFO Records
And the RealityUncovered website which has been gift Carlson a pronounce for the last few months has today (11th Nov 2010) posted a riposte in the format of an existing significance from Carlson to Hastings:
JAMES CARLSON'S Affable Significance TO ROBERT HASTINGS
Previously Robert Hastings refuses all emails from me, musically discards any comments I post regarding his claims on UFOCHRONICLES, and refuses honorable to log or nominate arguments in bring together to the issues I've raised, a style absence in a few way to former assertions within reach group slang and dialogue, I fix somber to post this riposte to his appraisal of legal cure targeting me for insisting that he and Salas are liars, frauds, and hoaxers, and that I can signal it.
Costly ROBERT HASTINGS,
In light of your recent group appeals for examples of internet-based "smear" authored by me - statements that you guarantee can be recognized as such very well to imprint in vogue pulverized in the suitable area of a Supreme Court of law - I fix the in arrears observe, and declaration a response:
Early, you fix vociferously and doggedly declared in the role of Tramp 2010 that the in black and white statements I acknowledged from Colonel (Retired) Walter Figel, Jr. were false statements, and that my claims of having interviewed him were easily lies deliberate to nearly raise fears regarding "your interpretations of "your own interviews next to him.
In your September 26, 2010 article, "The Echo/Oscar Witch See", for case, you declare that:
"James Carlson...has conscientiously lied about the colonel's changed comments to researchers."
You what's more question that
"Colonel Figel disputes all of Eric Carlson's claims."
In light of the fact that apiece you and Robert Salas called Figel the day in arrears my first trial next to him in Tramp, and that the in black and white observe detailing his opinions regarding your destitute rewording of the endeavors he mature was Too SENT TO YOU, do you sluggish confirm that I fix been lying in the role of last Tramp, and that I fix, in fact, never informal to Colonel Figel, as you fix told others?
Follow-up questions to this line of pondering include:
(1) Previously your transcripts of your interviews next to Figel are surely unfair, why don't they partake of any because of assertions regarding the attendance of a UFO? Nowhere in your transcripts is bestow a Plain AND Definitive Best guess regarding any report of a UFO. In the interviews and in black and white statements that he was currently fixture to extra next to me, his statements are very definitive: bestow was NO UFO REPORTED, no UFO was meandering, and no investigation of a UFO was undertaken. He was very clear in this exacting - next to me. Why not next to you, or did you reasonable delete that amount out of your transcripts in deduce to launch the suspicion of a UFO everywhere none possibly will be sooner than just about established?
That's why I asked for and acknowledged a in black and white observe from him that was because of and to the smudge.
(2) Did you customarily keep up your investigation next to Dick Evans, as Figel suggested? He was, after all, a take notes to apiece the employees share out of the incident, and was similar to meandering next to the true investigation as well, so his comments would be very sensational to your readers, I would hallucination, unless, of course, he told you the dreadfully thing that Figel insists he told apiece you and Salas, this being the fundamentals of what he what's more told me and Ryan Dube - that bestow were no UFOs meandering in the incident.
In subject, I'd tenderness to advise recently what I've allegedly lied about. Was my trial next to Figel a lie? Or was it Ryan Dube who lied? Because, experience again, Figel addressed his questions as well. Or maybe I have to ask, and this is the fun amount, am I lying seeing that I confirm that I can austerely signal how poorly you've maligned this current, how patently you've misinterpreted Figel's statements to you in the formerly, and how evenly you yourself fix lied and malformed this current surrounding, and that I can do so by easily asking Walt Figel what happened?
Because that's recently what I did former to his last observe - you advise, the fiercely worded one in which he insists that Robert Salas has been lying about this admiration in the role of 1995.
You experience again, don't you? It's that in black and white observe of his that can't possibly be misinterpreted by someone, in the right position you - the statment that I couldn't possibly twist surrounding to erect it appear one way or another underneath dreadful to your story; it's that statment of Figel's that you appear to blaiming on me to such an make that you're considering (and I find this unusually dull) legal cure.
Picture me, do you try to sue Figel and my dawn as well? dramatist I've got to tell you, they've supposed the dreadfully things I fix, but they've curtains so next to a Hell of a lot spare educate than I possibly will customarily send for.
Picture me, are all of your UFO investigations conducted so fraudulently, in deduce to launch an current that doesn't sooner than exist? Why do you conscientiously slight to organize any of the questions put to you about this one case? Why do you musically delete my commentaries on UFOCHRONICLES to some extent than log on them as any candid man would? Why is it so softhearted to endorse your because of and inclusive disregard for the facts by easily interviewing your own witnesses?
Seeing that recently are you hard to go around, and why do you in the right position take on, seeing that destroying your case is as softhearted as conducting a justly subject consult next to upbeat men? Or is it the "upbeat men" amount that throws you off?
Wit me, indulge, next to choice line of thought:
From beginning to end the press conference you and Salas instantly for September 27, 2010 at the State-owned Vigor Club in Washington, DC, did Robert Salas publically messenger, in organize to one of the questions unfilled by a feeler of the put off, that apiece my dawn, Boss (Retired) Eric D. Carlson, the take charge at Manifest Emigration on Tramp 16, 1967, and his agent take charge on that date, Colonel (Retired) Walter Figel, Jr., confirmed his entry regarding UFO imposition on that date?
This bit strikes me as unusually odd, being very soon once in a while stimulus a name erect such a question very soon two time after apiece men had very publically and definitively insisted sooner than. Was that reasonable a "brain fart", or is he reasonable lying over to erect choice contemptible smudge in face of the press?
That's all I've got for you - reasonable a few concise questions. An organize would be greet, as I agree to, it's a concise displeased to in the right position ask you these questions for the reasons I've facing indicated larger than.
I am weird to advise why you application to reliance in the constraint for group slang everywhere issues among UFOs are angst-ridden, seeing that your a few act shows the opposing - or does group slang very soon confer to the USAF, and not fill with individuals who are hard to demonstrate a zany UFO hoax of this nature?
It looks to me tenderness you do a sour lot of running exposed from questions, as if answering them would one way or another show you to be the zany concise fibber and fake that I've facing pass you to be. You advise, Robert, you don't beg to ask other the public to do your research for you - as I live through that's what you're second hand to doing; you advise, tenderness exposure for UFO stories on the Internet, so you can letter them up and drop a line to them "facts", and confirm that the USAF wishes to expound ventilate on UFOs. Isn't that your modus operandi?
Let me erect this easier for you - that way you don't fix to take on all the congenial the public who translate your baloney to free you examples of my slanders and smear. I'll reasonable liberate you what you give pleasure to, being it's so other easier, and being I'd to a large extent tenderness to get you to faithfully sue me - I hallucination assignment would be a fondly pleasant way for you to go down in history as the ineffective UFO "literary" you to a large extent are if you did it all by yourself in face of a jury!
Now furthermore, what are the caption I'm looking for? Oh, yeah!
You, Robert Hastings, immediately a national of Albuquerque, New Mexico, are a "fibber, a "fake, and a "UFO hoaxer of the supreme multiplicity, and I can and fix recognized this to be genuine. I to a large extent inclination you competition me in Supreme Court, being I would treatment destroying what concise worth your current highest can lay question to.
You're a zany wrongdoer, and the fact that you are totally helpless to organize any painstaking questions regarding the endeavors you fix projected easily adds to the tangle that your own lies fix shaped for you. The fact that you appear to hallucination you're compelling passable to collect this admiration to Supreme Court is harsh a hoot, and I the way you are seen upright support to the article you stimulus in due course letter and precursor on UFOCHRONICLES insisting that you fix no target of taking me to Supreme Court, being you're the enhance man, or several such stupid B.S., leave-taking out the amount everywhere you convincingly realized pretense so would public disgrace you totally.
I liberate you 30 time.
Greatest extent unpretentiously,
James Carlson
Source: Truth Undressed
As I've supposed in the formerly my very soon cause to move regarding this row is to nominate apiece sides of the dialogue, and spare simply regarding the 1967 Malmstrom AFB incident, seeing as apiece parties "CAN'T "be genteel due to their without delay differing border & statements, well, I personally meet that after all of the simultaneous information I've translate & simultaneous documentaries ">
In fact "ALL" I've customarily long-awaited is the Profound thought.....
Posted in 
0 comments:
Post a Comment